Sunday, October 20, 2013

Lucid News

Some big news on the Lucid front:

Saturday, October 19th, Lucid was screened as part of the 2013 Rhode Island International Horror Film Festival where it was named the recipient of the Providence Underground award.

Additionally, our first official review of Lucid was published on the Film Threat website.

"Lucid is...a pretty solid head-trip. Some fun visual effects work, lighting and compositional choices and a score that sets an uncomfortable stage, all come together to make things as uneasy for the audience as well as for the main character."

Read the full review

Thursday, September 26, 2013

September Updates


This month I am pleased to announce the following:

1) Lucid has been named an official selection of the 2013 Rhode Island International Horror Film Festival. This will be considered its world-premiere event.

2) The essay, The Ideal Candidate: Solaris as Philosophical Riddle Box has been published in issue 68 of the film journal Senses of Cinema. The article can be read here:

http://sensesofcinema.com/2013/feature-articles/the-ideal-candidate-solaris-as-philosophical-riddle-box/

Sunday, September 1, 2013

The Ideal Candidate: Solaris as Philosophical Riddle Box

Recently I completed a lengthy analysis of Steven Soderbergh's 2002 adaptation of Solaris.  This essay was accepted for publication by the Senses of Cinema online Film Journal.

Access the complete articles on the journal's website: HERE

Title: The Ideal Candidate: Solaris as Philosophical Riddle Box

Abstract: This article seeks to evaluate Steven Soderbergh's 2002 adaptation of Solaris in lights not often considered. In addition to a comparison of the film’s Visitors to Baudrillard's notion of the hyperreal, the author wishes to draw connections to the hosts’ abnormal psychological states and the effect on one's morality. Finally, the text itself is discussed as self-reflexively commenting on its own status as simulacrum through the concept or reproduction as adaptation.

Monday, August 26, 2013

Twerkin' 9-to-5

Somehow, it still amazes me the level of hyperbole and attention garnered by vapid celebrity culture today.  With our ephemeral (er, disposable) digital entertainment, MTV (and everyone else) is in need of inventing ways to keep its currency alive.  This reveals less about a quest for culture mined from substance and more about attempting to top the previous year’s absurdity.  And how could MTV ever truly compete substantively with Syrian chemical attacks or Congress’ Debt Ceiling?  It can’t.  However, what it can offer is the N’SYNC reunion no one asked for or Miley Cyrus’ twerkin’ on the VMA stage.  It is the latter that enthralled the zeitgeist so intensely these past 24 hours.  CNN’s homepage devotes not just a single story but a sizable section of web page real estate to a collection of stories about Miley’s six-minute performance.  All day long I’ve been bombarded with commentary on the news, at the water cooler, on my Facebook wall ranging from general moral outrage at the young starlet’s overt sexuality through damning and sexist objectification of her body.

What I see missing from the discourse is the accountability of everyone surrounding Miley Cyrus.  It should be transparent today that a pop-star is a carefully manufactured persona cultivated through scripted decisions and micro-managed PR.  To think that a team of agents, dance choreographers, lawyers, record label affiliates, and MTV network executives weren’t prepped and in-the-know about this stunt is ludicrous.  Miley’s performance is not the kinetic burgeoning of a young sexual being breaking free of her Disney Child Star past but a well-staged act to create the fiction of a young sexual being breaking free of her Disney Child Star past. 

If anything it is the child star that is the victim and not the perpetrator.  At the age of 27 I still make terrible decisions on a fairly regular basis.  If I had been groomed from an early age by an entourage who thought I could do no wrong, made obscene amounts of money, and had hit television shows and radio airplay, I’d probably be trying to build tree houses out of hotdogs or riding my pet shark while wearing a necklace of sirloin steak.  Unfortunately for her, Miley's mistakes are magnified through her celebrity to a level of noteriety unknown by all but a handful of human beings.  The point being: the Miley Cyrus on display last night is a kind of Frankenstein’s monster; a mish-mash of the desires of many (older) hands looking to create controversy.  Why?  Controversy generates news stories.  New stories keep items relevant.  Relevance generates cash flow.  Beneath the performer, is Miley Cyrus even a real person?  That’s the interesting question, to me.

And for everyone and their mother who felt the need to vocalize their opinions so loudly and harshly: that they didn’t approve of the garbage, the trash, the scandal then can I ask why were you watching the MTV Video Music Awards in the first place?  Did you tune to MTV for anything else?  Didn’t you realize that Breaking Bad was on?


AUTHOR'S NOTE: Shortly after posting this commentary, I was contacted by an A&R Administrator from Miley Cyrus' label RCA records.  She informed me that, "the label did not know about [the content of her MTV VMA performance].  Her camp may have, but we did not.  [Miley's] one of the few artists that label execs can't influence what they do - she is going to do what she wants, when she wants, how she wants..."